top of page

Updated: Jun 17

I really love my Unistellar eQuinox 2, my DwarfLab

dwarf 2 and my Seestar S50. Each unit has its strengths and weaknesses.


Dwarf 2 Photos which show its wide field of view.


Horsehead Nebula and Flame Nebula




Bode's Galaxy and the Cigar Galaxy

ree

Running man Nebula and Great Orion Nebula


ree

Rosette Nebula

ree

SeeStar S50's ability to image difficult nebula.


Monkeyhead Nebula

ree

Jellyfish Nebula

ree

Flaming Star Nebula

ree

Tadpole Nebula

ree

Unistellar eQuinox 2 ability to produce good images without requiring further processing



ree


ree


ree


ree


ree

 
 
 

Updated: Jun 17

I have taken photos of various deep sky objects with the Unistellar eQuinox 2, Dwarf 2 and SeeStar S50. Each of the photos was processed with Siril, Fits Scrubber and Photoshop.


M1

SeeStar S50


ree

Dwarf 2


ree

eQuinox 2


ree

Sun

SeeStar S50


ree

Dwarf 2


ree

eQuinox


ree

Pacman Nebula

SeeStar S50


ree

Dwarf 2


ree

eQuinox 2


ree

M42

SeeStar S50


ree

Dwarf 2


ree

eQuinox 2


ree

M31

SeeStar S50


ree

Dwarf 2


ree

eQuinox 2


ree

M31

SeeStar S50


ree

Dwarf 2


ree

eQuinox 2


ree

 
 
 

Updated: Jun 17

I took photos of the Great Orion Nebula with the Dwarf 2 and SeeStar S50. After some processing on Siril, and Fits Scrubber, I have photos for comparison. (Taken under a Bortle 6 sky, there was a light source on Seestar that I could not crop out. Someone with more photoshop skills would be able to eliminate it.)


Dwarf 2. With the Dwarf's wide angle you can also see the Running man Nebula.

ree

SeeStar S50


ree

I like each unit for what it does. The image quality is pretty good on both. I like the wide field of vision on the Dwarf and I like the detail on the SeeStar. It is hard to recommend one over the other. It is an individual choice if you can only have one.

 
 
 

For any media inquiries, please contact Mark Prelas:

Join my mailing list

Thanks for subscribing!

©2023 by Mark Prelas. Powered and secured by Wix

bottom of page